Reliability Information Analysis Center Forums

Go Back   Reliability Information Analysis Center Forums > RIAC Topics > Data Analysis and Testing
Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2002, 06:20 AM
Guest Guest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 968
Default Weibull Analysis Results

I am analyzing field failure data of an electronic system. When performing a Weibull analysis, I find a beta of 0.952 with 19 samples. The source of information is only accurate to the day (i.e., I only know what date a failure occurred, not exact time), so I expected some error from this. Given the age of the equipment being analyzed, it would be expected to be operating within it's useful life. How far from 1.00 does the beta need to be before I would be wrong in using an exponential distribution? How much error can I expect due to the time reporting limitations of my data source?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2002, 10:39 AM
RIAC Staff Member RIAC Staff Member is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 664
Default Weibull Analysis

To answer this two-part query we revisit the original problem. First, Mr. Rowland is using a well-known Weibull property [1,2,3,4,5]: if its shape parameter (Beta) is unit, Weibull reduces to an Exponential with mean, the scale parameter (Alpha). But Mr. Rowland is working with a sample, not with the population. Hence, there is a sampling error in his point estimation of the shape parameter Beta, which is a function of two factors: the sample size and other Weibull parameters (e.g. mean, variance, and scale).

Therefore, without having access to Mr. Rowland's sample there is no way to say whether 0.952 is good enough to assume Beta is unit (and Exponentiality of the data) or whether it is not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2002, 11:45 AM
Guest Guest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 968
Default Weibull Beta Confidence

All good points made. I agree. Now, just like you can construct confidence bounds around the Weibull characteristic life, you can also construct confidence bounds around the shape factor, Beta. That should help you to see how far the spread is above and below 1.0.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2011, 04:01 AM
denielnill denielnill is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Post Weibull Analysis

With rising production pressures it is critical to predict failures and prevent breakdowns. A systematic FMEA analysis, breakdown analysis and Weibull analysis can help avoid failures.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:10 AM
dvaidr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I notice that you are using Weibull for fielded items. Make sure you use MLE as opposed to straightforward Weibull, which assumes a perfect repair.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.